James
My feedback
10 results found
-
174 votes
Planned means we want to do it, not that it’s scheduled for a dev to work on yet.
Keep voting..
We just scheduled a few tasks that had 70+ votes, we can’t do this before those.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 voteJames shared this idea ·
-
1 voteJames shared this idea ·
-
22 votesJames supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment James commentedYes I'm in the midst of how to sort out 5 pricing levels we have per product. Were currently having to do it all via excel sheet reference!
-
9 votesJames supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment James commentedYes we could really use as well. For inventory sake, I use bundles to put parts and labor together. So if I want to sell the service online I am not even, sure how I would handle it.
-
2 votes
A PO make-over is up soon once serialized inventory is live. Hope to include some of these aspects in that pass!
An error occurred while saving the comment James commentedWhat ever happen with this? We desire PO for everything. We're having to keep track with a CSV right now for non-inventory
-
1 voteJames shared this idea ·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment James commentedSo just another request to elaborate on this. I'm not sure how complicated or possible it is on RS end.
Could the outbound make a pop-up during/after the call for the tech to enter relevant notes about the call?
Before I start this project, what does this do if someone generally uses the phone that's not related to RS?
-
42 votes
Just for clarification, we have multi-location inventory but this suggestion is to make it more granular “per-location” to have different settings per locations as far as what’s tracked/etc.
James supported this idea ·
@Troy This has been planned for 2 years? I just ran into this road block when attempting to run a lab to bring our MSP division to RepairShopR. How am I suppose to bring in hundreds of seats and not allow dozens of techs track time? Seems like a foolish thing for a company wanting to be a PSA